Lockdowns Failed. What We Do Next Doesn't Have To

Lockdowns Failed. What We Do Next Doesn't Have To
(Jeff Gritchen/The Orange County Register/SCNG via AP)

There is new proof government-imposed shutdowns prompted by the COVID-19 pandemic have done more harm than good. A better choice would have been to keep the economy open so people stay connected to work and targeting resources to vulnerable populations.

A new meta-analysis from Johns Hopkins University underscores this truth, revealing that lockdowns in America and Europe during the first pandemic wave in spring 2020 only reduced the death rate by 0.2% on average. Researchers concluded that lockdowns “have had little to no public health effects” while imposing “enormous economic and social costs” and should be “rejected as a pandemic policy instrument.”

Read Full Article »


Comment
Show comments Hide Comments


Related Articles