Last week, the New York Times finally acknowledged that the New York Post’s October 2020 story about Hunter Biden’s laptop was real. When the story broke in the Post in the days leading up to the 2020 presidential election, it was widely dismissed as “Russian disinformation,” with social media platforms moving swiftly to restrict sharing of it. The restrictions significantly reduced visibility of the story, and a year and a half later, the platforms have still not offered a full accounting of how they decided to suppress it – thus reinforcing the need for social platform transparency.
Just two weeks before the presidential election in 2020, the New York Post announced a journalistic bombshell: A laptop belonging to the Democratic candidate’s son and containing a wealth of compromising emails, letters, images, and videos had been abandoned at a computer repair store. Of particular relevance to the election were emails allegedly suggestive of questionable business arrangements with foreign nations and allegations of facilitations of access involving Joe Biden, who was vice president when the messages were written.
Read Full Article »