The Supreme Court ended last week with a “DIG.” Not the insult of common parlance, a DIG means they “dismissed a case as improvidently granted.” This says the Court, on second thought, decided they never should have taken the case.
The case, Arizona v. City and County of San Francisco, pertained to the Trump administration’s 2019 Public Charge Rule. This rule concerned the definition of criteria for determining which immigrants stood at risk of becoming a “public charge,” meaning a drain on public resources. It gave the government the power to deny entry or permanent legal status to those immigrants so designated.
Read Full Article »