Who Is MyRA?
No, not who, what. But it's still a valid question. When President Obama announced a new type of savings account during his State of the Union speech even he seemed unsure of how to pronounce it. (It is "my-R-A," a play off of "I-R-A," as in Individual Retirement Accounts.) As exciting as it was to hear the President accurately diagnose many of the problems with the nation's retirement planning system:
Today, most workers don’t have a pension. A Social Security check often isn’t enough on its own. And while the stock market has doubled over the last five years, that doesn’t help folks who don’t have 401ks. ... And if this Congress wants to help, work with me to fix an upside-down tax code that gives big tax breaks to help the wealthy save, but does little to nothing for middle-class Americans.
And to hear him propose a new way to help ordinary Americans save:
I will direct the Treasury to create a new way for working Americans to start their own retirement savings: MyRA. It’s a new savings bond that encourages folks to build a nest egg. MyRA guarantees a decent return with no risk of losing what you put in.
There was widespread confusion about what, exactly, the President was proposing. Economics writer Matt Yglesias couldn't figure it out. A panel of "regular folks" assembled by Fox News were totally perplexed. And truth be told, most of the savings policy wonks I know were desperate for details to see what myRA is and who it might help.
Many of the details are out now, and here's the thumbnail sketch:
MyRA is a type of Roth IRA, and Roth rules about eligibility, contribution limits and withdrawals apply.
MyRA can only be accessed through the workplace and is totally voluntary, the employer must choose to offer it and the employee must choose to participate in it.
MyRA sets up a "low friction" payroll deduction to make contributions easy.
MyRA has low barriers to entry, just $25 to open an account and contributions as low as $5/pay period.
MyRA's investment will be in a fund modeled on the federal Thrift Savings Plan's G Fund, a bond-based fund that offers protection against loss and a variable interest rate (1.47% in calendar 2013, 2.69% over the previous five years).
MyRA account holders will face no fees of any kind.
Once a myRA account reaches $15,000 in value (or 30 years in age) it must be rolled over into a privately managed Roth IRA.
So, what does all that mean for savers?
Here are a few things to keep in mind: almost half of workers now aren't saving for retirement, of those saving almost 60% have less than $25,000 saved, and half of those folks have less than $1,000. It gets worse, and it isn't confined to retirement savings. According to our friends at CFED 44% of Americans don't have enough savings to get by at the poverty level for three months if they lose their job. 30% of Americans don't even have a savings account. While not totally confined to the bottom of the income scale, there's a strong overlap between folks with low-incomes and folks without access to savings vehicles.
We don't just have a retirement savings crisis, we have a savings crisis. That's where I think the myRA proposal offers promise.
The key to this plan is that it is built around the Roth IRA and targeted at low and moderate income workers. Right now, 8% of households that earn less than $50,000 per year own a Roth IRA, so why try to expand that paltry figure?
Roth IRAs are funded with money that has already been taxed by the government (unlike 401(k)s and traditional IRAs) and that means the account holders can take their own contributions out of the account at any time without tax, penalty, or fee. On top of that, earnings in the account can easily be used to help pay for college or a downpayment on a home.
So what is the administration really doing here? They're leveraging workplace payroll systems to offer a free, safe and flexible savings account to people that simply don't access anything similar. That's a great idea.
Retirement savings experts usually fail to acknowledge the link between a lack of emergency savings and the lack of retirement savings and the way that retirements are thus undermined. The common answer is to lock off retirement funds so that desperate people can't use them in desperate times. The better path forward is to promote savings more broadly and more flexibly over the life course.
There are also going to be major implementation issues due to the voluntary nature of the plan. But if the administration can get employers to say yes, and can market the product well to employees who are already struggling to make ends meet and excluded from the economic mainstream, it could start to make a dent in America's emergency savings crisis.
MyRA isn't going to solve America's retirement savings crisis. But you need to walk before you can run, and you need to have emergency savings before you have retirement savings. MyRA has the potential to put struggling American families on the right path.
Justin King is policy director of the Asset Building Program at the New America Foundation. This piece originally appeared on the Asset Building Program's blog, The Ladder.